Regional Specificity in the Restoration of Wooden Architecture Objects in the Territory of Museums and National Parks in Russia

Authors

  • Oleg A. Romanov Saint Petersburg State University. Universitetskaya Emb., 7/9, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24852/2587-6112.2023.4.66.72

Keywords:

architecture, wooden architecture, restoration/conservation, museum complexes.

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of preservation of wooden architecture in Russia, the issues of protection and restoration of architectural sites in the Russian North and Siberia. The reasons why wooden architecture is facing an extremely high risk of extinction are revealed and options for conservation monuments are presented. The article concludes that it is necessary to rethink the concept of cultural heritage protection and improve the work of open-air museum complexes. Objects of wooden architecture are purposefully brought to a ruined state, no measures are taken to preserve. A striking example is the wooden buildings of the island and the urban locality of Dikson. Objects removed from the balance are destroyed naturally. The purpose of such activity is to maximize the capitalization of works on future restoration by inaction of the monument protection bodies of a subject. The reconstruction of wooden architecture objects and the creation of museum quarters often contradict the basic principles of consevation. An example of this is the museum quarter of Krasnoyarsk. The lack of a critical understanding of UNESCO requirements for wooden architecture objects in the Russian Federation leads to a decrease in the number of domestic professional carpenters and joiners. Artisans are left without necessary quality of scaffolding due to bureaucracy at the level of directors of national parks or administrations of the settlements. It is prohibited to carry out thorough repairs of wooden architecture objects by authorized bodies for the protection of sites. The method of rolling collection of fines from owners of houses, located in protected areas is used.

References

Gurov, M. B., Sakulina, E. V. (comp.). 2018. Arkhitekturnyy putevoditel' po derevyannomu zodchestvu Russkogo Severa (Architectural guide to wooden architecture of the Russian North). Moscow: Likhachev Russian Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage (in Russian).

Barashkov, Yu. 1992. Nostal'giya po derevyannomu gorodu. Arkhitektura, traditsii, byt Arkhangel'ska nakanune i posle 1917 goda. Formy i funktsii gorodskogo doma (Nostalgia for the wooden town. Architecture, traditions, life of Arkhangelsk before and after 1917. Forms and functions of a town house). Moscow: “Kriptopro-Logos” Publ. (in Russian).

Bode, A. B. 2010. Derevyannoe zodchestvo Russkogo Severa. Arkhitekturnaya sokrovishchnitsa Poonezh'ya (Wooden architecture of the Russian North. Architectural treasury of the Onega region). Moscow: “KomKniga” Publ. (in Russian).

Kozlova-Afanas’eva, E. M. 2014. In Otkrytyy tekst (Open Text) 4 (1), 22–31 (in Russian).

Ladeyshchikov, A. Yu., Ladeyshchikova, E. R. Kamennoe zhiloe zodchestvo XIX - nachala XX v. (Stone residential architecture of the XIX – early XX century).Available at: www.magnit-baikal.ru/publ/5-1-0-46 (accessed: 22.09.2022)

Opolovnikov, A. V. 2004. Russkoe derevyannoe zodchestvo (Kul'tovaya arkhitektura) (Russian wooden architecture (Religious architecture)).Moscow (in Russian).

Romanova, L. S. 2004. Zdes' nachinalsya Tomsk. Proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee (Tomsk began here. Past, present, future). Tomsk: TSUAB (in Russian).

Sevan, O. G. 1991. In Nikishin, N. A., Sevan O. G. (eds.). Na puti k muzeyu XXI veka. Muzei-zapovedniki (On the way to the museum of the XXI century. Museum-reserves). Moscow: Research Institute of Culture, 63–85 (in Russian).

Sevan, O. G. 2015. In Chepkunova, I. V. (comp.). Russkoe derevyannoe. Vzglyad iz XXI veka (Russian Wooden. View from the XXI century) 1. Moscow: “Kuchkovo pole” Publ., 22–28 (in Russian).Sitnikova, E. V. 2011. In Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta (Journal of Construction and Architecture) (1), 59–65 (in Russian).

In Fotii, L. A. et al. (comp.). 1985. Sozdanie arkhitekturno-etnograficheskikh kompleksov v muzeyakh pod otkrytym nebom (Creation of architectural and ethnographic complexes in open-air museums). Leningrad: State Museum of Ethnography of the Peoples of the USSR (in Russian).

Firsova, L. D. 1995. In Bostrem, L. A. et al. (eds.). Muzey pod otkrytym nebom v sovremennykh usloviyakh (Open-air museum in the modern context). Arkhangelsk: Arkhangelsk State Museum of Wooden Architecture and Folk Art “Malye Korely”, 56–62 (in Russian).

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Romanov , O. A. (2023). Regional Specificity in the Restoration of Wooden Architecture Objects in the Territory of Museums and National Parks in Russia. Arkheologiia Evraziiskikh Stepei (Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes), (4), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.24852/2587-6112.2023.4.66.72

Issue

Section

Research and Publication