RECONSTRUCTIONS OF THE ATTIRE OF ADORNMENTS OF THE EARLY HISTORICAL PERIOD OF VOLGA BULGARIA
Keywords:
attire, adornments, reconstruction, traditions, stages, interactionAbstract
Despite the complexity of the structure and changes in the population of the future Volga Bolgaria, general continuity can be outlined in the development of the attire of adornments.
The traditions of Saltovo (Bolgar) and the Kama-Urals (Finno-Ugric or Ugric) attires in the second half of 8th –fi rst half of 9th centuries can be distinguished in diff erent territories. The former lighter attire has the combined features of metal and jewelry ones, and the latter has retained the features of an abundant metal decoration. However, there is a tendency to use the adornments of one tradition in the attire of the other.
In the second half of 9th - fi rst quarter of 10th centuries the interactions of the attires resulted in their twinning. The variations are combined adornments of the Saltovo and Kama-Ural traditions. A transition is observed to more rational forms of attires, its easement and the gradual rejection of bulky jewelry connection systems and less frequent use of noisy parts.
Oval-cylindrical bead pendants and oval-cylindrical bead pendants played an important role in the formation
of filigree bead adornments of Volga Bulgaria of the 12th -13th centuries.
The general development pattern picture of the attire of adornments is in line with the concept according to which the population of the Middle Volga region was becoming more consolidated and produced similar forms of material culture.
References
Жилина Н.В. Сравнительный анализ хазарского и славяно-русского убора из украшений к костюму // Поволжская археология. 2017. № 2 (20). С. 127–156.
Казаков Е.П. Погребальный инвентарь Танкеевского могильника // Археология и этнографии Татарии. Вып 1. / Вопросы этногенеза тюркоязычных народов Среднего Поволжья. / Отв. ред. А.Х. Халиков. Казань: Институт языка, литературы и истории им. Г. Ибрагимова, 1971. С. 94–155.
Казаков Е.П. Танкеевский могильник (к вопросу об этнокультурных компонентах ранней Волжской Болгарии). Автореф… дисс.. канд. исторических наук. Казань, 1972. 22 с.
Казаков Е.П. Культура ранней Волжской Болгарии (этапы этнокультурной истории). М.: Наука, 1992. 335 с.
Казаков Е.П. Волжские болгары, угры и финны в IX–XIV вв.: проблемы взаимодействия. Казань: Институт истории АН РТ им. Ш. Марджани, 2007. 208 с.
Матвеева Г.И. Погребения VIII–IX веков в окрестностях г. Куйбышева // Очерки истории и культуры Поволжья. Вып. I. / Отв. ред. Е.И. Медведев. Куйбышев: Куйбышевский государственный университет, 1976. С. 33–39.
Матвеева Г.И. Погребения VIII–IX веков у разъезда Немчанка // Древности Волго-Камья / Отв. ред. Г.А. Федоров-Давыдов. Казань: ИЯЛИ им. Г. Ибрагимова КФАН СССР, 1977. С. 52–56.
Мерперт Н.Я. Материалы по археологии Среднего Заволжья // МИА. №42. / Труды Куйбышевской археологической экспедиции. / Отв. ред А.П. Смирнов. М: Наука, 1954. С. 39–156.
Финно-угры и балты в эпоху средневековья // Археология СССР / Отв. ред. В.В. Седов. М.: Наука, 1987. 513 с.
Халикова Е.А. Больше-тиганский могильник // СА. 1976. № 2. С. 158–178.
Zhilina N. 2016. Attire of adornments: the main historical stages: natural, heavy-metal, jewelry, the accessory. In Zilinskaite A. (ed.). 22nd Annual Meeting of the EAA, 31.08. – 04.09.2016. Vilnius.: Saulius Jokuzys Publishing Printing House, 87.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 N.V. Zhilina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
