URBAN CULTURE OF NOMADS OF THE STEPPE ZONE OF EURASIA IN THE PERIOD OF THE EARLY TURKS: STUDY PROBLEM STATEMENT

Authors

  • Demir K. Tulush Institute of Archaeology named after A.Kh. Khalikov, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan. Butlerov St., 30, Kazan, 420012, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24852/2587-6112.2021.2.338.345

Keywords:

archaeology, fortification, fortified settlement, Xiongnu, First Turkic Khaganate, Second Turkic Khaganate, Uygur Khaganate, Kyrgyz Khaganate

Abstract

The paper addresses the issue of identifying fortifi ed settlements of the First and Second Turkic Khaganate periods. For a long time, according the prevailing scientifi c viewpoint, the early medieval nomads of Central Asia had no towns. When Khara-Balgas, Por-Bazhyn, and other fortifi ed settlements were identifi ed in the late 19th century, a gradual study of the urban culture of the steppe people began, which existed from the Xiongnu period until the Mongol time. Currently, the best studied monuments date back from the period of the Xiongnu state, the Uyghur and Kyrgyz Khaganates, and the Mongol Empire. Despite the presence of separate information in written sources (Chinese chronicles, runic inscriptions, descriptions by Arab, Persian and European travelers of the 9th–14th centuries), so far there are no known towns of the actual Turkic period both in the Sayan-Altai region, and throughout the territory of Turkic dominion. There is an assumption that Khara-Balgas (Karabalgasun or Ordu-Balyk), the capital of the Uyghur Khaganate, was built on the ruins of the headquarters of Turkic khagans - Khara-Khorin or Khar-Elst. A comparison of the construction technology used in the Xiongnu and Uyghur periods demonstrates the substantial preservation of the 8th–9th century fortifi ed settlements due to the use of the “hang-tu” Chinese technology. This, and also taking into account a hypothesis concerning the possible continuity of the Xiongnu traditions in the Turkic period, suggests the signifi cant destruction of the Turkic towns both as a result of military operations, and under the infl uence of the time period. The development of modern technologies for identifying large archaeological sites using satellite images makes it possible to localize the inexpressive remains of previously unknown ancient towns in the vast Eurasian steppe area and carry out their large-scale studies. This study will shed light on the fate of the towns of the First and Second Turkic Khaganates.

References

Baipakov, K. M. 1989. In Masson, V. M. (ed.). Vzaimodeistvie kochevykh kul'tur i drevnikh tsivilizatsii (Interaction of Nomadic Cultures and Ancient Civilizations). Alma-Ata: “Nauka” Publ., 336–345 (in Russian).

Bichurin, N. Ya. 1950. Sobranie svedenii o narodakh, obitavshikh v Srednei Azii v drevnie vremena (Collection of Details of the Peoples Living in Central Asia in Ancient Times) 1. Moscow, Lenindrag: Academy of Sciences of the USSR (in Russian).

Danilov, S. V. 2004. Goroda v kochevykh obshhestvakh Tsentral'noy Azii (Towns in the Nomadic Societies of Central Asia). Ulan-Ude: Buryatia Scientifi c Center, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).

Evtiukhova, L. A. 1949. In Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta istorii material’noi kul’tury (Brief Communications of the Institute for the History of Material Culture) XXXVI. Moscow, Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 97–114 (in Russian).

Zinyakov, N. M. 2019. In Vestnik Kemerovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Yniversiteta (Bulletin of Kemerovo State University). 21 (4), 932–939 (in Russian).

Ibn Khoradbekh. 1986. Kniga putei i stran (Book of Routes and Countries). Baku: “Elm” Publ. (in Russian).

In Muminov, A. K. 2010 (ed.). Istoriia Kazahstana v arabskikh istochnikakh (History of Kazakhstan in Arabic Sources) 2. Almaty: “Daik-Press” Publ. (in Russian).

Kiselev, S. V. 1949. In Materialy i issledovaniia po arkheologii SSSR (Materials and Research in the USSR Archaeology) 9. Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR (in Russian).

Kiselev, S. V. 1957. In Sovetskaya arkheologiya (Soviet archeology). (2). 91–101 (in Russian).

Klements, D. A. 1895. Arkheologicheskii dnevnik poezdki v Sredniuiu Mongoliiu v 1891 g. (Archaeological Diary of a Journey to Central Mongolia in 1891). Saint Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences (in Russian).

Kyzlasov, I. R. 2011. Kol'tsevye gorodishcha Khakasii. K istorii monumental'noi arkhitektury na Enisee (Khramovaia arkhitektura drevnosti) (Ring Settlements of Khakassia. The History of Monumental Architecture on the Yenisei (Temple Architecture of Antiquity). Moscow: “TAUS” Publ. (in Russian).

Kyzlasov, L. R. 1959. In Sovetskaya arkheologiya (Soviet archaeology) (3). 66–80 (in Russian).

Kyzlasov, L. R. 2006. Gorodskaia tsivilizatsiia Sredinnoi i Severnoi Azii: istoricheskie i arkheologicheskie issledovaniia (Urban Civilization of Central and Northern Asia: Historical and Archaeological Studies). Moscow: “Vostochnaia literatura” Publ. (in Russian).

Kyzlasov, L. R. 1959. In Sovetskaya arkheologiya (Soviet archeology). (3). 66–80 (in Russian).

Maidar, D. 1971. Arkhitektura i gradostoitel’svto Mongolii (Architecture and Town Building of Mongolia). Moscow: “Stroiizdat” Publ. (in Russian).

Malov, S. E. 1959. Pamiatniki drevnetiurkskoi pis’mennosti Mongolii i Kirgizii (Monuments of Ancient Turkic Writing in Mongolia and Kyrgyzstan). Moscow, Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR (in Russian).

Nikolaev, N. N. 2001. Kul'tura naseleniia Tuvy pervoi poloviny I tysiacheletiia n.e. (Culture of Tuva Population in the First Half of the 1st Millennium AD.). Diss of candidate of historical Sciences. Saint Petersburg (in Russian).

Puteshestvie v vostochnye strany Plano Karpini i Rubruka (The Journey of Plano Carpini and William of Rubruk to the Eastern Parts). Moscow: “Geografgiz” Publ. (in Russian).

Perlee, H. 1957. In Sovetskaya arkheologiya (Soviet archeology). (3). 43 (in Russian).

Savinov, D. G. 2009. Minusinskaia provintsiia khunnu (po materialam arkheologicheskikh issledovanii 1984–1989 gg.) (Minusinsk province of the Xiongnu (Based on Archaeological Study Materials of 1984-1989.). Saint Petersburg: Institute for the History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg State Universit (in Russian).

Sadykov, T. R. 2015. In Bazarov, B. V. (ed.). Aktual'nye voprosy arkheologii i etnologii Tsentral'noy Azii (Actual issues of archaeology and ethnology of Central Asia). Irkutsk: “Ottisk” Publ., 286–292 (in Russian).

Soenov, V. I., Trifanova, S. V., Konstantinov, N. A., Shatanakova, E. A., Soenov, D. V. 2011. Cheposhckie gorodishcha (Cheposh Hillforts). Gorno-Altaisk: Gorno-Altaisk State University (in Russian).

Syma Tsian. 2002. Istoricheskie zapiski (Historical Notes). Moscow: “Vostochnaia literatura” Publ. (in Russian).

Tulush, D. K. 2013. In Tishkin, A. A. (ed.). Sovremennye resheniia aktual'nykh problem evraziiskoi arkheologii (Contemporary Solutions to the Current Issues of Eurasian Archaeology). Barnaul: Altai State University, 106–110 (in Russian).

Tulush, D. K. 2014. In Sitdikov A. G., Makarov N. A., Derevianko A. P. (eds.). Trudy IV (XX) Vserossiiskogo arkheologicheskogo s″ezda v Kazani (Proceedings of the 4th (20th) All-Russia Archaeological Congress in Kazan) III. Kazan: “Otechestvo” Publ., 477–480 (in Russian).

Tulush, D. K. 2018. In Tishkin, A. A. (ed.). Sovremennye resheniia aktual'nykh problem evraziiskoi arkheologii (Contemporary Solutions to the Current Issues of Eurasian Archaeology). Barnaul: Altai State University, 216–220 (in Russian).

Khudyalov, Yu. S., Komissarov, S. A. 2002. Kochevaia tsivilizatsiia Vostochnogo Turkestana (Nomadic Civilization of East Turkestan). Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University (in Russian).

Yadrintsev, N. M. 1890. In Izvestiia Russkogo geografi cheskogo obshchestva (Bulletin of the Russian Geographical Society) 26(4), 257–271 (in Russian).

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Tulush, D. K. (2021). URBAN CULTURE OF NOMADS OF THE STEPPE ZONE OF EURASIA IN THE PERIOD OF THE EARLY TURKS: STUDY PROBLEM STATEMENT. Arkheologiia Evraziiskikh Stepei (Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes), (2), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.24852/2587-6112.2021.2.338.345

Issue

Section

Research and Publication

Most read articles by the same author(s)